Marketing Articles

Customer Relationships Articles (click here for more)


 

"Facts" Get in the Way of Winning Customers, Market Share

By: Andy Marken

In his nearly 25 years in the advertising/public relations field, Andy has been involved with a broad range of corporate and marketing activities. Prior to forming Marken Communications in mid-1977, Andy was vice president of Bozell & Jacobs and its predecessor agencies. During his 12 years with these agencies, he developed and coordinated a wide variety of highly visible and successful promotional campaigns and activities for clients. A graduate of Iowa State University, Andy received his Bachelor's Degree with majors in Radio & Television and Journalism. Widely published in the industry and trade press, he is an accredited member of the Public Relations Society of America (PRSA).


You are viewing the U.S. bookstore. Click here to view the Canadian store.
Ries and Trout (Marketing Warfare) brought us the vernacular of the military establishment.  Tom Peters (In Search of Excellence) gave us a more peaceful approach by urging us to listen to customers.  Corporate management has been reading the words without digesting the essence of the statements.  The result is they're still focusing on pulling in new customers month after month and quarter after quarter, and leaving existing customers to fend for themselves.


You are viewing the U.S. bookstore. Click here to view the Canadian store.
As they view the battles of the marketplace through the wrong end of the telescope, company management emphatically states that they know what customers want and need.  These are the people who proclaim that they have the pulse beat of the marketplace despite the fact that they haven't been on a customer sales or follow-up call for six months.

Management has flown over the battlefield, but hasn't made the time nor found it necessary to spend time in the trenches with their foot soldiers -- sales, support and service.  They've spent so much time focusing on beating the competition that they've lost sight of their ultimate goal -- winning customers.

Corporate managers should listen a little closer to Ted Levitt, former editor of Harvard Business Review, as he continually told us,  "the purpose of business is to create and KEEP a customer."

Rather than changing their service and support for existing customers, companies continue to blame the competition for "stealing" people away.  And all the while they are perfectly straight-faced and saying:
  • "We already know who our customers are."
  • "Our business comes from word of mouth."
  • "Everyone knows us."
  • "Business is great, so we don't need to market."

Knowing Customers

If you know who your customers are, don't you think that just maybe your competitors know them, too?  Of course they do! And if the truth were known, the best competitors not only know your customers, but they spend time with them listening to their wants, needs and concerns.  They don't approach their business using hit and run tactics such as lower prices or next-generation technology.

Instead, they focus on winning that customer over by providing advice, assistance, support and service.  And while you're out trying to win over a new customer, you quietly lose an existing one.

But wouldn't it have been better and more economical to retain that customer you "already knew?"

It may have cost $1,000 to keep the customer, but it will cost $5,000 simply to replace them.  It's little wonder marketing costs continue to rise.


Word of Mouth

The second greatest lie in marketing is that the company relies on word of mouth advertising to attract new business.  The fact is that everyone relies on word of mouth to get new customers.  Ford does it.  McDonald's does it.  IBM does it.  Coca-Cola does it.  Hershey does it.

In fact, for years Hershey was proud of the fact that word of mouth was the only marketing activity they had.  The problem was they lost customers and market share.  They had to become more aggressive and more visible in their marketing and communications efforts.

Word of mouth is a powerful tool, but you have to look at all aspects of word of mouth.

For example, noted marketing expert Bill Davidow recently noted that TARP (Technical Assistance Research Programs) pointed out that only one out of every 25 unhappy customers complained to the manufacturer.  That's great, since none of us like to hear complaints.

Unfortunately, those other 24 unhappy customers did tell 10 people about their dissatisfaction.

The fact is that since we feel we "deserve" to be satisfied, we don't voice our satisfaction at the same rate.  In fact, satisfied customers only tell five others.

In short, relying solely on word of mouth marketing and communications is a losing battle.


Everyone Knows Us

"Everyone" in the computer and communications industries knows Compaq, Lotus, IBM, Cisco, 3COM, Dell, Nortel, Ascend, Hewlett Packard and a few other prominent names.  Likewise, "everyone" knows Ford, McDonald's, United Airlines, Panasonic, Toyota, Coke, Porsche and similar names.

Unfortunately, everyone doesn't know the name of every small, medium or even many large organizations.

Ford, McDonald's, Coke and IBM regularly carry out extensive and expensive name recognition research projects.  At no time has any of them scored 100 percent in the area of name recognition.  In many instances, when the name was known it was for the wrong reason.

This is especially true in industries, which change so rapidly and so radically.

If your company has been in existence for five years it probably doesn't look anything like it did back then.  Chances are you've had a "few" management, product and distribution changes over the years, with more planned for this year and next.

The way the "known" companies mentioned earlier stay known is by consistently and aggressively marketing and communicating their message(s) to the marketplace.  They manage their risks and they manage their opportunities, rather than having the risks and opportunities manage them.

They manage risks and opportunities by listening.  They listen to existing customers, prospects and lost customers.  They find out who these people are, what their needs and wants are, their likes and dislikes and their decision-making processes, as well as the options they consider.

With this kind of information, they are in a position to significantly minimize risks and optimize opportunities.

It's no wonder they win more frequently, have greater sales and continue to increase their market share.


Business is Great

The biggest problem with the computer industry is that it goes in cycles.  And all to often, management of second and third tier firms use the peaks and valleys as excuses for their marketing and communications activities.

When the company is on top of the mountain, business is so good that the backlog is almost unbearable.  They have more business than they can "ever" handle.  Hence, they don't need to be aggressive in their marketing and communications.  In fact, they have to "keep a lower profile" because they couldn't satisfy the customers' needs even if they sent a certified check with the order.

When the company is in a valley, business is so bad that they can't afford the "luxury" of marketing or communications. Instead, they need to conserve all of their resources and focus all of their efforts in immediate sales.

Despite the overwhelming statistics by the Business and Professional Advertising Association (BPAA) and leading market research firms that show solid marketing has a cumulative effect, management views the marketing budget as an expense rather than an investment.  At the first whisper of problems or given the weakest excuse, they will slash their marketing and communications budgets.

The marketplace's consistent winners, however, understand that solid marketing and communications develops growth for their firms in the future.  And any retreat from that position can likewise have a negative effect on growth.  The winners performance also shows that when downturns occur, they are less severe for them than their knee-jerk competitors and they recover more quickly.

In other words, they are in a better position to manage their growth and their market dominance.


Levels of Expectation

When it comes to planning and managing growth, too many firms think in terms of a one-year plan or, worse yet, a one-quarter plan.  Too many companies seem to take pride in their organization's ability to produce immediate, innovative and sweaty solutions to perplexing adversity.

At the other end of the spectrum, the chairman of Japan's giant Mitsui Corporation was once asked if his organization had a long-range plan, and his response was yes -- a 200 year plan.

By keeping short-term and long-range plans in proper perspective, a company can continually fine-tune their marketing, products and communications efforts.

Using these plans as war room plans, management has to continuously and fearlessly spend time at the front to get inputs and ideas from customers, prospects, sales people, service engineers and support technicians.  Then they can judge all of their activities from the Pentagon and the foxhole.

They must continually come out from behind the protection of their desk and make decisions based on the reality that people, not technology or lofty plans, sell products and people buy products.  Then the "facts" won't get in the way of their success.

© Copyright 1999, G.A.Marken, Marken Communications

Other Articles by Andy Marken

The author assumes full responsibility for the contents of this article and retains all of its property rights. MarcommWise publishes it here with the permission of the author. MarcomWise assumes no responsibility for the article's contents.

 

Match: Any word     All words
Note: Searches will not find words, such as 'marketing', that appear in more than half of the articles or words less than five letters long.

 


Would you like us to consider your own articles for publication? Please review our submission and editorial guidelines by clicking here.